Mohd. Anees v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27975 of 2018…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27975 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27975 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mohd. Anees Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Virendra Singh Tomar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shashi Dhar Sahai
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Sri Shashi Dhar Sahai learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent-bank.
Learned counsel for the respondent-bank has pointed out that the recovery was initiated against three sons (heirs of the loanee namely Shareef Ahmad). One of the sons had approached this Court challenging the recovery certificate dated 03.04.2018 wherein an order dated 13.04.2018 has been passed disposing of the writ petition with the observation that the entire amount is recoverable in the instalments as per the schedule fix therein.
A copy of the judgement and order dated 13.04.2018 has been placed before this Court.
This fact is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. The present petition filed by another heir of the loanee challenging the same recovery certificate dated 03.04.2018, therefore, is not maintainable.
Dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 18.8.2018 Himanshu
Mohd. Anees
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court