Partly allowed

Randhir Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC1 Aug 2018WRIC/25680/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition sought stay of bank recovery proceedings initiated due to loan default. The court stayed the proceedings conditionally, directing the petitioner to repay the principal and interest in six equal installments before revenue authorities. Trust of the payment was made conditional on timely deposit.

What did the court decide?

Stayed recovery proceedings conditionally on payment of outstanding principal and interest in six equal installments before revenue authorities.

Randhir Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Banking and Recovery | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 36

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25680 of 2018

¶3

Petitioner :- Randhir Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dan Bahadur Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Parshuram Chaubey

¶4

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel and Sri Parshuram Chaubey, learned counsel for the respondent Bank.

¶6

The petitioner had taken a loan and was unable to pay the installments on time. Consequently, recovery proceedings have been instituted to recover the balance amount.

¶7

There is no illegality in the recovery proceeding but the petitioner contends that he is willing to pay the entire amount in installments.

¶8

Learned Standing Counsel as well as counsel for the Bank are agreeable to the prayer made by the petitioner provided he repays the entire dues with interest regularly.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶10

The recovery proceedings shall remain in abeyance provided;

¶11

(1) The petitioner pays the entire outstanding amount with upto date interest in six equal installments to be deposited before the revenue authorities.

¶12

(2) The first installment of Rs. 75,000/- shall be paid on or before 2nd September, 2018.

¶13

(3) On deposit of the first installment, the respondent bank would furnish the complete statement of accounts showing all the deposits which have been made by the petitioner till date and the balance amount payable.

¶14

(4) Rest of the amount shall be deposited by the petitioner in five quarterly installments.

¶15

(5) Any amount already deposited shall be given adjustment.

¶16

(6) The petitioner shall make deposit of the last installment along with upto date interest.

¶17

(7) In the event of default in any of the installments, it would be open to the respondents to recover the amount forthwith.

¶18

(8) As only the citation has yet been issued and the recovery has not been proceeded with, it is, therefore, directed that, in case, the petitioner makes deposit as per the schedule above, no recovery charges shall be realised from him.

¶19

Order Date :- 1.8.2018 Pratima

Randhir Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Randhir Singh v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Varun Kumar @ Varun Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U P and Another

Komal Singh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Harvinder Singh Alias Harvidra Singh and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Virendra and Another Vs State of U P and 6 Others

Chandra Dutt Shukla Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Avtar Singh Vs State of U P and 2 Others