Petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The single-judge bench dismissed the writ petition as not pressed by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 23016 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Khiladi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Jand 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rahul Sharma,Atul Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhishek Sharma
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Sri Abhishek Sharma learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent no.4.
At the very outset, Sri Atul Sharma learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not want to press the present writ petition.
In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 25.7.2018 Himanshu
Ram Khiladi
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
