Petitioner failed to appear when the writ petition reached the end of the calendar. The High Court dismissed the petition for want of prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22930 of 2009
Petitioner :- Smt. Manju Chhari (Manju Rajendra Chhari) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 4.10.2018 nd
Smt. Manju Chhari
State Of U.P.
Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
