The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the absence of the petitioner to press the case. Any interim order granted earlier is vacated.
Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22088 of 2009
Petitioner :- Prahlad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.N. Mishra
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
List has been revised. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, is vacated.
Order Date :- 4.10.2018 nd
Prahlad
State Of U.P.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
