Rajednra Prasad Pathak and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging unauthorized road construction by a Land Development Committee without acquisition. Court directed the District Magistrate to expeditiously decide any future application filed by petitioners, with a timeline preference of two months. The court clarified it did not adjudicate on merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction to District Magistrate, Sonebhadra to decide any application filed by petitioners regarding the grievance expeditiously and preferably within two months after hearing parties.