The High Court disposed of a writ petition concerning a boundary dispute. The court left the petitioners' remedy under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 open and did not decide the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 19125 of 2018
Petitioner :- Raman And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajeet Kumar Shukla,Anil Kumar Chaurasia
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manoj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
The dispute in the present petition is regarding the boundaries.
It is for the petitioners to institute the appropriate proceedings under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006.
Leaving it open to the petitioners to avail of this remedy, we dispose of this petition.
Order Date :- 28.5.2018 SK
(Dilip Gupta, J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari, J.)
Raman And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 6 Others
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
