The writ petition was dismissed as it was withdrawn by the petitioner without expressing desire to press the matter. No substantive legal issue was decided during the hearing. No separate hearing was conducted after the petition was withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 45
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17306 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Priti Rani And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jata Shankar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Jata Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State. Sri Rakesh Kumar Mishra has entered appearance on behalf of respondent no.5.
Learned Standing Counsel pointed out that the petitioners are admittedly not married.
Sri Jata Shankar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners do not want to press the writ petition.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Date :- 23.5.2018 Pramod
Priti Rani
Another
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
