Petitioners failed to appear. The court held the writ petition was wholly misconceived with no justification for interference and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15374 of 2018
Petitioner :- Chandra Prakash Singh @ Monu @ Chandra Bhan Singh And 4 Ors Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajendra Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Bachchoo Lal,J.
The list has been revised. None appears to press this petition.
This writ petition has been filed, inter alia, for the following relief;
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No. 1 to ensure that the petitioners may not be harassed at the behest of Respondent No. 2 by misusing the process of law.
Heard learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record.
The petition is wholly misconceived. We do not see any justification to interfere in the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 8.5.2018
vinay
Chandra Prakash Singh @ Monu @ Chandra Bhan Singh And 4 Ors
State Of U.P. And Anr
Shashi Kant Gupta
Bachchoo Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
