The High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Up Ziladhikari to expedite and conclude the pending restoration application within one year, ensuring opportunity of hearing to stakeholders.
Directions to expedite hearing of the pending case and conclude within one year with proper opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15301 of 2018
Petitioner :- Mastraj Respondent :- State Of U P And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Omkar Nath Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
Notice need not be issued to the private respondents in view of the order proposed to be passed.
The petitioner is before this Court with the request to command the Up Ziladhikari, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, Dsitrict Kushinagar to decide the restoration application in Case no.T200954435 (Seeta Ram and others vs. Awadhesh and others) under Section 229-B of UPZA&LR Act, expeditiously.
Learned Standing Counsel very fairly states that in case the aforesaid case is still pending, the same shall be considered and decided by the Authority concerned expeditiously.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, on consent, the writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the Up Ziladhikari, Tehsil Tamkuhiraj, Dsitrict Kushinagar to expedite the hearing of the aforesaid case and conclude the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of a certified copy of this order before him, without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties, except upon payment of cost but certainly after according opportunity of hearing to all the stake holders in the matter.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018 A. Pandey
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of on consent directing the authority to expedite the pending restoration application.
Mastraj
State Of U P
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
