This order partially allowed a protection petition filed in 2016 where petitioners were absent. The court noted the interim purpose had outlived utility after two years but presumed the State had granted protection.
Petition partly allowed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1527 of 2016
Petitioner :- Sushil Chhavada And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mahesh Chandra Tiwari,Kiran Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order Date :- 20.9.2018 DKS
2 issues framed by the court
Whether protection petition requires further hearing when petitioners are absent and interim order has aged out of utility?
Whether to grant further relief given the presumption that State protection has been granted after interim order?
Sushil Chhavada
State Of U.P.
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
