The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking protection. No counsel appeared. The court presumed the State granted protection post-interim order. The petition was partly allowed in the absence of any contest.
Petition partly allowed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1220 of 2016
Petitioner :- Smt. Sonam @ Shabnam & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amar Nath Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Order Date :- 20.9.2018 DKS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking protection should be allowed when the petitioners and their counsel are absent after interim relief was granted.
Smt. Sonam @ Shabnam & Another
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
