Disposed

Ramveer Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2018WRIC/14236/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition challenging recovery proceedings under the U.P. Agricultural Credit Act, 1973. It directed the petitioner to deposit the outstanding loan amount in eight quarterly installments, stayed recovery proceedings until default, ordered the release of attached agricultural property, and referenced a Full Bench judgment regarding collection charges.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to deposit entire amount in 8 quarterly installments starting 15.05.2018; recovery proceedings stayed; attached property to be released after first installment.

Ramveer Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 33

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14236 of 2018

¶3

Petitioner :- Ramveer Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Neelam Pandey,Gavendra Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,P.K.Singhal

¶4

Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned Standing Counsel for the respondents 1 and 2; and Sri P.K. Singhal for the respondent no.3.

¶6

The present petition has been filed challenging the recovery proceeding initiated by the third respondent, under Section 11-A of the U.P. Agricultural Credit Act, 1973, to recover Rs.3,07,659/- plus interest, etc. in respect of credit facility availed by the petitioner from the respondent-bank.

¶7

Counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the amount which is sought to be recovered from him.

¶8

Admittedly, the petitioner took loan from the respondent-Bank concerned out of which petitioner has not paid substantial amount. Petitioner submits that he is ready to deposit whole of the amount in easy installments. Counsel for the Bank states that the anxiety of the Bank is that the amount is recovered back.

¶9

Accordingly this petition is disposed of with the following directions:

¶10

(i) Petitioner may deposit the entire amount sought to be recovered directly in concerned Bank in 8 quarterly installments.

¶11

(ii) The first installment shall be deposited by 15.05.2018 and the rest of installments shall be deposited at intervals of three months thereafter. These deposits shall be made with the Branch of the Bank from where the loan was taken.

¶12

(iii) Recovery proceedings during this period will be kept in abeyance. In case petitioner commits default in depositing any of the installments within the above stipulated time, it will be open to the respondents to start the recovery proceedings again by taking coercive process to which the petitioner undertakes not to challenge.

¶13

(iv) Petitioner may file an application for supply of statement of

¶14

account along with the duly stamped self addressed envelope. In case any such application is filed, the concerned branch of the Bank will give the same to the petitioner after deposit of the first installment within fifteen days and in calculating the arrears, the amount (if any) already paid will be adjusted.

¶15

(v) Property (agricultural land/tractor) belonging to the petitioner, if attached, in connection with recovery proceedings, will be released by the concerned Tehsil authority (unless it has already been auctioned) after deposit of first installment. However, unless the property has already been auctioned, no third property right shall be created by the petitioner in either mortagaged or hypothecated property till entire bank dues are cleared.

¶16

(vi) If the installments are deposited as per the schedule fixed in this order, the recovery of collection charges would remain in abeyance till such time the Collector takes a decision and determines the collection charges/fee payable as per the legal provisions and in the light of Full Bench decision of this Court in the case of Maharajwa and others versus State of U.P. and others, reported in 2013(1) ADJ 426 (FB) . Upon determination of collection charges/fee the Collector will communicate the same to the petitioner upon which the petitioner would either deposit the same within a period of 30 days or, if not satisfied, would be at liberty to assail the same in appropriate proceedings.

¶17

Order Date :- 19.4.2018 AKShukla/-

Ramveer Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramveer Singh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aneesh Vs Smt. Seema Noor

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Furkan Hussain and Another

Reliance Nippon Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs the Insurance Ombudsman and Another

Raja @ Rajendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bijendra Singh Alias Bijendra Tyagi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jasvir Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others