Smt. Priyanka Yadav and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner absent to file adversary. Respondent submits an FIR was lodged. Court dismissed the writ petition.
Petitioner absent to file adversary. Respondent submits an FIR was lodged. Court dismissed the writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 27
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12575 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt. Priyanka Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Shri Anuj Kumar, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 4 and has filed his vakalatnama today in the Court.
Learned Standing Counsel submits that an FIR has been lodged in the instant case. That being the case, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 9.4.2018 Ravi Prakash
Smt. Priyanka Yadav And Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court