The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an electricity bill amount. The court held the petitioner could avail an alternative statutory remedy under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
The petition was disposed of; the petitioner was directed to avail the remedy under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 11934 of 2018
Petitioner :- Ram Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hemant Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Chandan Agarwal
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
The petitioner dispute the amount raised in the bills submitted by the respondent-Power Corporation.
Sri Chandan Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents has pointed out that the petitioner can avail of the remedy provided under Clause 6.5 of the U.P. Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
Leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the said remedy, we dispose of this petition.
Order Date :- 2.4.2018 Junaid
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ram Kumar
State Of U.P
Another
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
