The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to engage counsel despite deemed notice of non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 8010 of 1981
Petitioner :- Vindhyachal & Others Respondent :- D.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S. Nandan Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,A.N. Singh
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
In view of office report dated 25.10.2018, service of notice upon the petitioner to engage another counsel is deemed sufficient. None has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in revised list.
Writ petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 2.11.2018 Sanjeev
Vindhyachal & Others
D.D.C. & Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
