The Single Judge dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dismissing a revision under Section 9 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953. The court upheld the concurrent findings of fact recorded by the authorities and found the writ lacking merit due to the petitioner's absence.
Writ petition lacking merit dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 60
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 7896 of 1981
Petitioner :- Narain Singh & Others Respondent :- J.D.C. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Vidharthi,J.D. Pradhan,R.A. Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,R.S.Mauriya,Y. Singh
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the present writ petition.
This writ petition is directed against the order of the Joint Director of Consolidation Etah, Camp Rampur dismissing the revision- petition arising out of proceedings under Section 9 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953.
The Consolidation Authorities have recorded concurrent findings of fact, which in the opinion of the Court does not warrant any interference.
Writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018 Sanjeev
1 issue framed by the court
Whether this Court should interfere with the order of the Joint Director of Consolidation dismissing the revision petition.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narain Singh & Others
J.D.C. & Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
