The single judge dismissed the writ petition lacking merit, noting it arises from proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1908, which are summary. The petitioner lost in courts below and can file a regular suit to raise title questions.
Writ petition dismissed for lack of merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 60
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 70529 of 2013
Petitioner :- Jigni Respondent :- Board Of Revenue And 5 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- S.K. Purwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,S.K. Mishra
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised. Nobody is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the present writ petition.
The matter arises out of proceedings under Section 34 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act.The petitioner has lost from all the courts below. However, proceedings under Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1908 are summary in nature and it is always open for the petitioner to raise question of title by instituting regular suit.
The writ petition lacks merit and is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 24.8.2018
Sanjeev
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition under Article 226 requires to be dismissed when the petitioner has lost in courts below under the summary procedure of Section 34 of U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1908.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jigni
Board Of Revenue
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
