Surendra Nath v. B.R.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no appearance was put in to press the matter. Any interim order was vacated.
What did the court decide?
dismissal of writ petition for want of prosecution; vacation of interim order
What the court decided
Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1198 of 1981
Petitioner :- Surendra Nath Respondent :- B.R. Counsel for Petitioner :- H.N.Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- S.C.,G.C.Gahrana
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Matter pertains to 1981.
List revised. No one has put in appearance to press the petition.
Writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 20.4.2018 Mukesh Kr.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Surendra Nath
- respondent
B.R.
Coram
Suneet Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIB/1198/1981
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court