The court disposed of the writ petition in terms of a prior judgment in Writ A No.2868 of 2018, finding the controversy squarely covered by that earlier decision.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 18
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 6375 of 2018 Petitioner :- Manorma Respondent :- State Of U.P And 02 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Shri A.K. Yadav, learned counsel appearing for the third respondent submit that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order rendered on 6.2.2018 in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others ).
The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of in terms of the judgment rendered in Writ A No.2868 of 2018 (Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others).
Order Date :- 22.2.2018 RKP
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 othersFollowed¶4
Writ A No.2868 of 2018 ( Bibha Singh Kushwaha and 21 others vs. State of UP and 2 others )
Manorma
State Of U.P
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
