Writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite counsel seeking an adjournment on an order marked peremptory.
Petition dismissed and interim order vacated
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 58095 of 2013
Petitioner :- General Manager,North Central Railways Ald. And Anr. Respondent :- Shri Niwas Sharma And 11 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K.Gaur Counsel for Respondent :- Vinod Kumar
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Case called out.
No one appears for the petitioner.
One Sri Vijay Kumar Rai, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Rajnish Kumar Rai for the petitioner requests for adjournment.
The writ petition is of the year 2013 and is marked as peremptory in the cause list.
We do not see any ground for adjourning the writ petition and the same is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 29.8.2018 Kirti
General Manager, North Central Railways Ald. And Anr.
Shri Niwas Sharma And 11 Ors.
B. Amit Sthalekar
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
