This court allowed a civil miscellaneous withdrawal application. The underlying writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the parties.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 51379 of 2016
Petitioner :- Dr. Vighnesh Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 6 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Dr. Neel Kamal Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I.,Rijwan Ali Akhtar,S.K. Pal
Hon'ble B. Amit Sthalekar,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application no.3 of 2018 dated 7.8.2018 supported by affidavit is taken up.
Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel holding brief of Dr. Neel Kamal Sharma for the applicant.
The prayer in the application is that the writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
Sri A.A. Akhtar, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection.
Accordingly, the application is allowed.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 29.8.2018 Kirti
Dr. Vighnesh Kumar
Union Of India
B. Amit Sthalekar
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
