Writ petition dismissed as infructuous by single judge observing that the petition has become infructuous and interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 58
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 54375 of 2003
Petitioner :- Birendra Kumar Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mayank Bhushan,A.K. Malviya,D.P.S.Chauhan,V.K.S.Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Mr. U.N. Singh Kushwaha, Advocate (A.O.R. No.A/U 0013/2012), holding brief of Sri V.K.S. Kushwaha, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the present writ petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as such.
In view of the statement made, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.12.2018 Ajeet
Birendra Kumar Maurya
State Of U.P.
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
