Riyasat Ali Khan Vs State of U.P.

Court No. - 18

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 4543 of 2018

Petitioner :- Riyasat Ali Khan Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Petitioner :- Lakshmi Kant Trigunait,Dev Kant Trigunait Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel and Shri B.N. Yadav, Advocate appearing for third, fourth and fifth respondents.

¶6

Petitioner claims to have been appointed as Head Master, Upper Primary School, Nalheada Ved Begampur, Block Puwanrka, District Saharanpur and has attained the age of superannuation on 30.06.2015.

¶7

By the instant petition, petitioner seek to ensure payment of salary for the month July 2015 to November 2015 to the petitioner. Further prayer has been made to direct the respondents to ensure the payment of interest against the arrears of salary arising upon the respondents against the services of the petitioner till the date of actual payment of the same.

¶8

Learned counsel for the parties submit that the controversy involved in the petition is squarely covered by a decision rendered in Writ-A No. 33360 of 2017 (Angad Yadav and others v. State of U.P. and others) , which was filed by the similarly placed persons challenging the same impugned order and seeking similar and identical relief, and this Court has passed a detailed judgement and order allowing the writ petition, therefore, it is urged that the petition may be decided in terms of the aforementioned decision.

¶9

The parties are agreed that the facts of the present petition are identical to that of Angad Yadav (supra) and this writ petition may also be decided in the same terms.

¶10

In view of the above, the present writ petition is also allowed in the same terms as in Angad Yadav (supra).

¶11

Order Date :- 5.2.2018 A. Pandey

Riyasat Ali Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Riyasat Ali Khan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C/M Kishan Junior High School Sherpur Khader, Muzaffarnagar through Its Manager, Babu Singh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

C/M Janta Junior High School Karhera, Muzaffarnagar, through Its Manager Manoj Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Arbind Kumar Singh and 1 Other Vs State of U.P.and 4 Others

Sahab Sartaj Vs State of U.P.

Rajesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Ram Bharose Vs the State of Uttar Pradesh