In a call for revision where the petitioner was absent, the High Court examined the writ petition seeking payment of pensionary benefits for the late husband. Finding the case not maintainable on merits, the Court dismissed the petition and vacated the interim order.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 44565 of 2013
Petitioner :- Smt.Sandhya Mahrotra (Widow) Respondent :- State Bank Of India Thru A.G.M. And 2 Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Sumit Goyal Counsel for Respondent :- Satish Chaturvedi
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
(1). Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent authorities-respondent authorities to pay all Pensionary/retirable benefits, i.e. pension, gratuity, Provident fund of hear late Husband to the petitioner in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 16.4.2018 Vikram
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pensionary benefits including pension, gratuity, and Provident fund for the late husband.
Whether this Court should interfere in the matter to direct payment of the benefits.
Smt. Sandhya Mahrotra
State Bank Of India
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaquat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
