None appeared to press the writ petition seeking quashing of orders and appointment under dying in harness Rules. The Court found the matter infructuous and dismissed the petition vide order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 38414 of 2013
Petitioner :- Yogendra Chauhan Respondent :- Union Of India & Anr. Counsel for Petitioner :- Raghvendra Shankar Srivas Counsel for Respondent :- Vivek Singh,Kartikeya Saran
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
(a). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 08.03.2010 passed by Divisional Railway Manager North East Varanasi (Annexure No. 9) and the impunged order dated 21.05.2013 passed by Member of Central Administrative Tribunal Bench Allahabad (Annexure No. 11).
(b). issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding to the respondents to appoint the petitioner in the Railway under dying in harness Rules.
Order Date :- 16.4.2018 Vikram
Yogendra Chauhan
Union Of India
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
