Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as no one was present to press it on behalf of the petitioners. Any interim order is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 37664 of 2017
Petitioner :- Arun Kumar Vishwakarma And 4 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parmeshwar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
List is being revised.
Nobody is present to press the instant writ petition on behalf of the petitioners.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 20.11.2018 Anand Verma
Arun Kumar Vishwakarma and 4 Others
State Of U.P. and 4 Others
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
