The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging a promotion decision. The court held the petition was incompetent due to nonjoinder of an established junior employee and that a delay of 13 years in challenging the promotion barred the remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35708 of 2006
Petitioner :- Pritam Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit,Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prem Chandra
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
for promotion to the post of Safai Nayak in view of the averments made in the counter affidavit.
5. The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 6.8.2018 Ashish Tripathi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a belated challenge to a promotion alleged to be incorrect superseding 13 years later is maintainable?
Pritam Kumar
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
