Petitioner filed writ petition alleging cancellation of proceedings. Respondents did not object to the statement that proceedings were cancelled. Court dismissed petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30415 of 2017
Petitioner :- Akhilendra Nath Maurya Respondent :- Union Of India And 2 Othrs. Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Pandey,Nand Lal Pandey
Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,Padmaker Pandey,Yatindra Shukla
Hon'ble Mrs. Sangeeta Chandra,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner says that the proceedings against which the petitioner had filed this writ petition have been cancelled by the respondents.
Shri Bal Mukund, learned counsel appears on behalf of respondents no. 2 & 3 also does not object to such statement being made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 7.12.2018 VR
Akhilendra Nath Maurya
Union Of India
Sangeeta Chandra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
