In this writ petition filed by Chhedi Lal Gupta seeking quashing of an administrative order and stay of criminal proceedings, the High Court dismissed the petition noting the absence of the petitioner and its counsel. The Court held that no case for interference could be made out, rendering the matter infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 30305 of 2013
Petitioner :- Chhedi Lal Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P.& Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vivek Kumar Singh,Bhagwati Prasad Singh,Rajeev Trivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
(i) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.11.2011 passed by Principal Secretary (Agriculture), Sachivalaya, Vidhan Bhawan, Lucknow, (Annexure No. 10).
(ii) to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 not to proceed in criminal trial against the petitioner on the basis of First Information Report dated 06.07.2005.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.11.2011.
Whether to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent not to proceed in the criminal trial against the petitioner.
Chhedi Lal Gupta
State Of U.P.
Another
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
