The court dismissed this writ petition challenging an order of suspension and the appointment of an inquiry officer. It held that the petitioner has not demonstrated any legal infirmity in the suspension order and the writ lacks merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10297 of 2018
Petitioner :- Kishore Kumar Jha Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Awadh Narain Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
Order Date :- 20.4.2018 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Rule 7 of the U.P. Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 applies prior to the completion of a departmental inquiry.
Whether an order of suspension and appointment of inquiry officer against the petitioner is legally sustainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishore Kumar Jha
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
