Petitioners voluntarily withdrew the writ petition based on a Supreme Court restraint order. The High Court dismissed the petition accordingly.
The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 25664 of 2018
Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Singh And 339 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Balbeer Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly states that this petition would merit dismissal in light of the restraint issued by the Supreme Court on 10 August 2015 in SLP (C) No. 25377-78 of 2014 .
Accordingly in light of the above, this petition is dismissed .
Order Date :- 5.12.2018 faraz
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
SLP (C) No. 25377-78 of 2014Relied on¶5
Arvind Kumar Singh And 339 Others
State Of U.P. And 8 Others
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
