Dinesh Chandra Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24158 of 2007…
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24158 of 2007…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 28
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 24158 of 2007
Petitioner :- Dinesh Chandra Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Naval Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
None appears to press the writ petition on behalf of the petitioner. The name of the learned counsel for the petitioner is shown in the cause list. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-State is present.
The petitioner was suspended by order dated 08.01.2001 in contemplation of disciplinary enquiry.
Learned Standing Counsel for the State submits that the charges, which are being investigated by the departmental enquiry, are serious enough to warrant a major punishment in case such charges are proved.
A perusal of the charge-sheet discloses that the charges laid out against the petitioner are grave acts of misconduct, which if proved in the departmental enquiry, would result in a major penalty. There is no infirmity in the order of suspension.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.9.2018 Ashish Tripathi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of suspension of the petitioner in contemplation of disciplinary enquiry warrants interference?
Dinesh Chandra Srivastava
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court