In a revision case filed by a lecturer seeking relief to continue service as an honorarium lecturer, the High Court found the petition lacked merit and became infructuous due to absence of counsel. The court dismissed the writ petition and vacated any interim order.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21120 of 2014
Petitioner :- Anshuman Kumar Pathak Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.L. Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashok Gupta
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Ifaqat Ali Khan,J.
" (a) To, issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to insure the payment of petitioner and future be pleased to directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue the service as honorarium lecturer in pursuance to the earlier order."
Order Date :- 17.4.2018 Swati
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ court should interfere in the petitioner's application to continue service as an honorarium lecturer.
Anshuman Kumar Pathak
State Of U.P.
"3 Others"
Sudhir Agarwal
Ifaqat Ali Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
