The petitioner withdrew the writ petition by stating lack of interest. The court dismissed the petition.
The writ petition is dismissed due to the petitioner's withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20432 of 2018
Petitioner :- Sukhpal Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Upadhyay,Vinod Kumar Upadhyay
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ravindra Singh
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
After some arguments Sri Santosh Kumar Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 10.10.2018 Pramod
Sukhpal Singh
State Of U P
2 Others
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
