Petitioner was informed the petition is dismissed after counsel stated a separate petition challenges a representation order. Liberty granted to file fresh petition. (Paras 1-7)
Petition dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15684 of 2018 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhanu Pratap Singh,Ashok Malaviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prakash Padia
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Prakash Padia, learned counsel for the respondent - University.
Sri Prakash Padia, learned counsel for the respondent - University, states that representation of the petitioner has been decided by the competent authority of the University by order dated 23.7.2018, which is not under challenge in the present writ petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he shall file a fresh writ petition to challenge the order dated 23.7.2018.
In view of the aforesaid, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh writ petition.
Order Date :- 25.7.2018/vkg
Santosh Kumar And Another
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
