Mohd. Asif and Another Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Court No. - 39

Case :- WRIT - A No. - 12798 of 2018 Petitioner :- Mohd. Asif And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Suyash Pandey,Nand Lal Pandey,Vijay Pratap Singh

¶3

Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.

¶4

Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.

¶5

Counsel for the petitioners does not press the prayers made in the writ petition and submits that the petitioners' case is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court dated 28 February 2018 in Writ-C No. 12735 of 2014 and connected petitions and prays for its disposal in terms thereof.

¶6

Counsel for the State does not dispute the submission made on behalf of the petitioners.

¶7

In the circumstances, we dispose of the instant writ petition in terms of the order dated 28 February 2018. For the sake of convenience, we reproduce operative portion of the order dated 28 February 2018 as under:

¶8

"... In the circumstances, counsel for the parties, have agreed for disposal of the these writ petitions, by the following order:

¶9

The third respondent, U.P. Police Recruitment and Promotion Board, shall consider the petitioners' claim for promotion as and when they undertake the exercise of promotion to the post of Sub-Inspectors in future, if they are otherwise eligible for the promotion. It is needless to mention that the petitioners will have to clear physical efficiency test as provided in the Rules, as amended in 2013. In other words, the petitioners will have to clear physical efficiency test for promotion on the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) as per the relaxed criterion, 2015, as observed by the Supreme Court. It is made clear that, under any circumstance, the petitioners shall not claim notional promotion or any other benefits from any date, earlier to their actual promotion. With these observations, writ petitions are disposed of.".

¶10

Order Date :- 28.5.2018 SK

¶11

(Neeraj Tiwari, J.) (Dilip Gupta, J.)

Mohd. Asif and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Asif and Another v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarita Srivastava Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Sandeep Kumar Gupta Vs State of U.P. and 3 Ors.

Jai Shankar Gautam Vs State of U P and 3 Others

Arif Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sanjeev Kumar and 5 Others Vs Union of India and 2 Others

Pankaj Tiwari Vs State of Up and 2 Others