The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the counsel for the petitioner did not appear to press the petition.
Petition dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10804 of 2001
Petitioner :- Rajendra Prasad Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others. Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Shanker Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Radhey Shyam
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
List revised. None is present on behalf of the petitioner to press the petition.
Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 7.3.2018 Mukesh Kr.
Rajendra Prasad Pandey
State Of U.P.
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
