Dismissed
Mahatam v. D.I.O.S.and Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/10017/2001
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for lack of prosecution as no one appeared to press it. Any interim order, if granted, stands vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 10
¶2
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 10017 of 2001
¶3
Petitioner :- Mahatam Respondent :- D.I.O.S.& Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
¶4
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
¶5
List revised.
¶6
None appeared to press the writ petition.
¶7
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
¶8
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶9
Order Date :- 6.3.2018 K.K. Maurya
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Mahatam
- respondent
D.I.O.S. & Others
Coram
AI extract
Suneet Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- WRIA/10017/2001
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court