Tarun Chetana Sansthan and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioners did not desire to press this PIL. The petition was dismissed as not pressed without any substantive adjudication or findings.
The petitioners did not desire to press this PIL. The petition was dismissed as not pressed without any substantive adjudication or findings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 12064 of 2013
Petitioner :- Tarun Chetana Sansthan And Anr. Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bhoopendra Nath Singh,Devendra Pratap Singh
Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J.
Sri J.P. Singh, who has been authorized by Sri Bhoopendra Nath Singh learned counsel for the petitioners, states that the petitioners do not desire to press this petition.
The petition is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
Order Date :- 11.4.2018 Akram
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Neeraj Tiwari,J.)
Tarun Chetana Sansthan And Anr.
State Of U.P. And Others
Dilip Gupta
Neeraj Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court