Special Appeal declared infructuous due to a subsequent event and dismissed without further discussion. No substantive legal principle was laid down.
Special Appeal dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 414 of 2018
Appellant :- Ganga Ram Balmiki Respondent :- Sunil Kumar Pandey And 4 Ors Counsel for Appellant :- Ashok Kumar,Uma Kant Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Prabhakar Awasthi
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
Learned counsel for the appellant states that in view of the subsequent event taken place, this appeal has become infructuous.
Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 16.7.2018 Shubham
(Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) (Govind Mathur, J.)
Ganga Ram Balmiki
Sunil Kumar Pandey
Govind Mathur
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
