This Special Appeal was disposed of by following the Division Bench judgment in Special Appeal No. 506 of 2018 regarding Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) criteria for appointments as Assistant Teachers.
Appeal disposed of in terms of the judgment in Special Appeal No. 506 of 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 21
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 399 of 2018
Appellant :- Ashutosh Tripathi And 34 Ors Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 22 Ors Counsel for Appellant :- Prashant Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dhananjay Awasthi,Mangla Prasad Rai,Pranesh Dutt Tripathi,Virendra Chaubey
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
This appeal is barred by limitation of 16 days. Ignoring the same we have looked into the merits of the case.
This appeal is before us to examine the correctness of the order dated 8.5.2018 passed by the learned Single Bench in Writ-A No.12700 of 2018 (Ashutosh Tripathi and 43 others Vs. State of U.P. and 13 others. Learned single Bench allowed the writ petition in terms of judgment given in Writ - A No. 52021 of 2017 (Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 others) .
Learned single Bench by judgment dated 8.5.2018 passed in the case of Prabhat Kumar Verma and others (Supra) directed the appointing authority to ensure that before appointment letters are issued to the candidates, he/she must have passed Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) after completing training course or such persons were in the final year of their training examination. A person, who does not come in either of the two categories, would not be issued any appointment order. The State Government is further directed to implement its order dated 15.05.2013 by issuing a circular for its strict compliance by the appointing authority. The appointing authorities are also directed to clearly state such fact in the appointment letter issued to the candidates appointed as Assistant Teachers. Petitioners in the petition for writ aforesaid, were kept at liberty to challenge such specific appointments before the appointing authorities, i.e. the District Basic Education Officer concerned at the first instance, who shall examine such individual grievances on facts after affording opportunity of hearing to the selected candidates. The entire process as stated above, is directed to be concluded within a period of six months from the date of raising the grievance before the appointing authority.
A challenge was given to the judgment given by the learned Single Bench in the case of Prabhat Kumar Verma and others (Supra) by way of filing Special Appeal No.506 of 2018, connected with other appeals. The appeal aforesaid came to be disposed of on 30.5.2018 with a minor modification in terms that the District Basic Education Officer was directed to carry out the exercise to
find out the names of the persons who have passed graduation without Science or Mathematics as one of the subjects.
In view of what has been stated above, the instant matter also requires to be decided in light of the judgment of the Division Bench in Special Appeal No.506 of 2018, Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 others .
Accordingly this appeal is disposed of in the terms of the judgment referred above.
Order Date :- 13.7.2018 Prajapati
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashutosh Tripathi and 43 others Vs. State of U.P. and 13 othersReferred¶6
Writ-A No.12700 of 2018
Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 othersReferred¶6
Writ - A No. 52021 of 2017 (Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 others)
Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 othersApplied¶10
Special Appeal No.506 of 2018, Prabhat Kumar Verma and 53 others vs. State of U.P. and 33 others
Ashutosh Tripathi And 34 Ors
State Of U.P. And 22 Ors
Govind Mathur
Chandra Dhari Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
