Due to the absence of the appellant to press the pending applications, the court rejected the delay condonation and substitution applications for want of prosecution. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution with the interim order discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 26
Case :- SECOND APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 26 of 2012 Appellant :- Keshav Nath Respondent :- Mukti Narayan Chaturvedi Counsel for Appellant :- Arun Tiwari,P.N. Tripathi,Rajesh Kumar,Sanjeev Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J.
Order on Delay Condonation Application No. 299146 of 2016
Case taken up in the revised list. Nobody is present to press this delay condonation application.
Accordingly, the delay condonation application filed in support of Substitution Application No. 299147 of 2016 is rejected for want of prosecution.
Order on Substitution Application No. 299147 of 2016
As the delay condonation application filed in support of this application is rejected for want of prosecution, the present application is also rejected.
Order on Memo of Appeal
As the delay condonation application as well as substitution application have been rejected for want of prosecution in the revised call, the present appeal is also dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 22.10.2018
sailesh
Keshav Nath
Mukti Narayan Chaturvedi
Ajit Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
