Shareef Ahmad v. Amin Uddin
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant filed a second appeal but had no instruction. The court dismissed the appeal in default of prosecution and vacated any interim order.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed in default of prosecution; interim order if any stands vacated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1256 of 1992
Appellant :- Shareef Ahmad Respondent :- Amin Uddin Counsel for Appellant :- Subodh Kumar,Subodh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- V.S.Jauhari,Anurag Jauhari
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
Sri Udit Chandra Advocate holding brief of Sri Subhodh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant states that he has no instruction in the matter.
In view of the above statement, the appeal is dismissed in default of want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.1.2018 Monika
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shareef Ahmad
- respondent
Amin Uddin
Coram
Shashi Kant
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/1256/1992
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court