In Second Appeal No. 1020 of 1993, the appellant failed to appear and prosecute the appeal. The appeal was dismissed in default.
Appeal dismissed in default of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 57
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 1020 of 1993
Appellant :- Pradumna Kishan Gurtoo Respondent :- Kunwar Satyabir Counsel for Appellant :- Deo Raj Counsel for Respondent :- Dhruv Narain,S.K. Sharma
Hon'ble Shashi Kant,J.
List revised. No one appeared on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed in default of want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.1.2018 Monika
Pradumna Kishan Gurtoo
Kunwar Satyabir
Shashi Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
