The petitioner, mother of the detenue Premu, stated custody was secured. The High Court held the habeas corpus writ petition infructuous and dismissed it without engaging with merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3646 of 2018
Petitioner :- Premu (Minor) Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Saxena Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned A.G.A. for the State.
On the matter being taken up today, it has been stated on behalf of the petitioner-Smt. Neelam wife of Rakesh that in this case, the custody of the detenue-Premu has been secured by the petitioner, therefore, this habeas corpus writ petition has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this habeas corpus writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.9.2018
S Rawat
Premu
State Of U.P.
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
