Prem Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal Appeal against conviction under Section 307 IPC dismissed as abated because the sole appellant, Prem Singh, had expired.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
Court No. - 42
Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 1802 of 1991
Appellant :- Prem Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- A.C.Nigam Counsel for Respondent :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
By way of instant appeal, challenge has been made to the validity and sustainability of the judgment and order of conviction dated 17.9.1991 passed by Additional Asst. Session Judge, Etah in Session Trial No.96 of 1991 (State Vs. Prem Singh), under Section-307 I.P.C., Police Station-Jalesar, District-Etah, whereby, the appellant was sentenced to eight years rigorous imprisonment.
In compliance of the order dated 2.2.2018 passed by the Court, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra has reported vide letter dated 24.8.2018 that sole appellant-Prem Singh has since expired.
In view of above, this appeal is liable to be dismissed as abated.
The present appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 13.9.2018 S Rawat
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prem Singh
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
Arvind Kumar Mishra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/1802/1991
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court