A habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed as ex-parte due to the petitioner's non-appearance and vague facts stated, with liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3499 of 2018
Petitioner :- Deepa And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Malviya,Mohd. Iqbal Farooqui Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Upon bare perusal of the entire writ petition, it is obvious that the facts stated in this writ petition are vague.
Accordingly, this habeas corpus writ petition is dismissed with liberty to file fresh.
Order Date :- 8.8.2018 S Rawat
Deepa
Deepa And Another
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
