Dismissed
Reena Sonkar @ Reena Vishwas and Another v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCHABC/3243/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. -…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. -…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3243 of 2018
Petitioner :- Reena Sonkar @ Reena Vishwas And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamlesh Kumar Yadav,Piyush Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
It has been claimed by Sri Kamlesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners that in this case corpus- Smt. Reena Sonkar @ Reena Vishwashas returned to petitioner no.2- Raju Vishwas, therefore, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition has been infructuous.
Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous .
Order Date :- 8.8.2018 Raj
Reena Sonkar @ Reena Vishwas And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court