In this habeas corpus petition, the petitioner's counsel stated that the petitioner committed suicide during the pendency. The court consequently dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The habeas corpus writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 42
Case :- HABEAS CORPUS WRIT PETITION No. - 3287 of 2018
Petitioner :- Reeta And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Chandra Mishra,Rajeev Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Sri Rajeev Upadhyay, learned counsel for the petitioners informs that corpus- Smt. Reeta w/o Satybhan has committed suicide during pendency of this case, therefore, petition becomes infructuous.
In view of above, this Habeas Corpus Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructous.
Order Date :- 19.7.2018 Raj
Reeta And Another
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
